<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2bscene to be believed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/general/2bscene-to-be-believed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/general/2bscene-to-be-believed/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, SEO, Web Design and Web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:20:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/general/2bscene-to-be-believed/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/?p=27#comment-375</guid>
		<description>The first image, which can still be found on the site did give us great exposure. The only reason we got rid of it was really because I was getting bored with people mentioning it to me!

Stock imagery has its uses, but I agree it is a problem when using royalty free images and anyone can use the same image.

We (like I&#039;m sure the majority of design houses are the same) don&#039;t update our website enough, but maybe this is a good reason to contemplate it! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first image, which can still be found on the site did give us great exposure. The only reason we got rid of it was really because I was getting bored with people mentioning it to me!</p>
<p>Stock imagery has its uses, but I agree it is a problem when using royalty free images and anyone can use the same image.</p>
<p>We (like I&#8217;m sure the majority of design houses are the same) don&#8217;t update our website enough, but maybe this is a good reason to contemplate it! <img src='http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/general/2bscene-to-be-believed/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 08:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/?p=27#comment-370</guid>
		<description>No probs Tom, it&#039;s a very attractive graphic and as David says it&#039;s a slight downside of stock images.

When I expand down south I&#039;ll change the graphic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No probs Tom, it&#8217;s a very attractive graphic and as David says it&#8217;s a slight downside of stock images.</p>
<p>When I expand down south I&#8217;ll change the graphic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Behan</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/general/2bscene-to-be-believed/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>David Behan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 08:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/?p=27#comment-368</guid>
		<description>This is the problem with stock photography. Although, both sites are using the image differently. If you were both after the same market, it&#039;d be an idea changing one of the sites as potential buyers might get confused but you&#039;re not so it won&#039;t matter too much.

@Tom: I liked you previous image used. It added a bit of controversy and humour to your design! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the problem with stock photography. Although, both sites are using the image differently. If you were both after the same market, it&#8217;d be an idea changing one of the sites as potential buyers might get confused but you&#8217;re not so it won&#8217;t matter too much.</p>
<p>@Tom: I liked you previous image used. It added a bit of controversy and humour to your design! <img src='http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/general/2bscene-to-be-believed/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 20:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/?p=27#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Firstly, thanks for the comments!

Apologies for the use of the same graphic, we obviously have great taste ;)

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, thanks for the comments!</p>
<p>Apologies for the use of the same graphic, we obviously have great taste <img src='http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
