<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google shows Keyword Search Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/seo/google-keyword-search-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/seo/google-keyword-search-numbers/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, SEO, Web Design and Web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:20:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/seo/google-keyword-search-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/?p=62#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>Credit to Google for releasing these figures.

From my own experience I think this can be very useful for quick comparisons. 

The data is always going to be skewed though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credit to Google for releasing these figures.</p>
<p>From my own experience I think this can be very useful for quick comparisons. </p>
<p>The data is always going to be skewed though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James F</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/seo/google-keyword-search-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>James F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelwall.co.uk/?p=62#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>Yea it&#039;s great they started doing this. I wonder how accurate the numbers are though as they are definitely not exact.

I&#039;ve noticed lots of the them having the exact same frequency, which makes me think they&#039;ve just taken the numbers based on the bar that was there before...

I&#039;m sure it&#039;a accuate enought to have some idea anyway...

Google does seem to be moving towards providing more information and resources to designers and marketers, which has to be a good thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea it&#8217;s great they started doing this. I wonder how accurate the numbers are though as they are definitely not exact.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed lots of the them having the exact same frequency, which makes me think they&#8217;ve just taken the numbers based on the bar that was there before&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;a accuate enought to have some idea anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>Google does seem to be moving towards providing more information and resources to designers and marketers, which has to be a good thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
